Outcome
The court affirmed the Department of Labor & Industries' decision that Interwest Insulation, despite leasing its workforce from Barrett Business Services, remained the employer responsible for industrial insurance premiums because it retained control over the workers' physical conduct.
What This Ruling Means
**What Happened**
Interwest Insulation hired workers through a staffing agency called Barrett Business Services instead of employing them directly. When the Washington Department of Labor & Industries said Interwest still had to pay worker insurance premiums for these employees, the company disagreed. Interwest argued that since Barrett was technically the employer on paper, Barrett should be responsible for paying the insurance costs, not them.
**What the Court Decided**
The court sided with the Department of Labor & Industries and ordered Interwest to pay $38,453.02 in premiums. The court ruled that even though Interwest used a staffing agency, they were still the real employer because they controlled how the workers did their jobs on a day-to-day basis. The legal paperwork showing Barrett as the employer didn't matter as much as who actually supervised and directed the workers.
**Why This Matters for Workers**
This decision protects workers by ensuring they have proper insurance coverage regardless of complex employment arrangements. When companies use staffing agencies or subcontractors, workers are still entitled to the same workplace protections. Employers cannot avoid their responsibilities to workers simply by hiring through third parties while maintaining control over the work.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.