No specific laws identified for this ruling.
The court affirmed the Board's decision that the 2010 work stoppage was a lockout, not a strike, and therefore claimants were not ineligible for unemployment benefits under Section 402(d). The court held that the employer unlawfully changed the status quo by unilaterally modifying the tuition reimbursement policy in violation of the PLRB order.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.