Skip to main content

Larry E. Parrish, P.C. v. Nancy J. Strong

Tenn. Ct. App.September 30, 2021No. M2020-01145-COA-R3-CV

Case Details

Judge(s)
Judge Arnold B. Goldin
Status
Published
Procedural Posture
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Excerpt

This is but the latest appeal in what has been a prolonged course of litigation between the parties. In a prior appeal, this Court ruled in favor of Ms. Strong on all issues raised by the professional corporation and also held, among other things, that an injunction regarding disputed funds in the case should be dissolved. On remand, the trial court accordingly dissolved the injunction and ordered the court's Clerk & Master to pay the disputed fund proceeds to Ms. Strong and her attorneys. The professional corporation now appeals from this decision. We affirm and hold that the funds should be immediately disbursed to Ms. Strong pursuant to the trial court's order. Further, finding the professional corporation's appeal to be frivolous under Tennessee Code Annotated section 27-1-122, we remand the case for a determination of Ms. Strong's damages incurred on appeal.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** This case involved a prolonged legal battle between lawyer Nancy Strong and her former employer, the law firm Larry E. Parrish, P.C. The dispute centered around money that was being held by the court while the parties fought over who was entitled to it. This appears to be part of a larger employment dispute that had been going through the court system for some time. **What the Court Decided** The appeals court had previously ruled in Strong's favor on all issues raised by the law firm. Following that earlier victory, the trial court was instructed to dissolve an injunction (a court order that was preventing the money from being released) and pay the disputed funds to Strong and her attorneys. The case was sent back to the lower court to carry out these instructions. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case shows that employment disputes can be complex and lengthy, sometimes involving multiple court proceedings over several years. When workers prevail in employment cases, they may be entitled to recover funds that were tied up during litigation. The case also demonstrates that employees can successfully challenge their former employers in court, even when facing well-resourced professional firms, and that courts will enforce orders to release disputed funds when appropriate.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.