Outcome
The Kentucky Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals and affirmed the Workers' Compensation Board, holding that the franchisor (Doctors' Associates, Inc./Subway) was not a statutory contractor liable for workers' compensation benefits to an employee of its uninsured franchisee because the work performed by the franchisee was not a regular or recurrent part of the franchisor's business.
What This Ruling Means
**Subway Franchisor Not Responsible for Franchisee's Workers' Compensation**
This case involved a worker at a Subway sandwich shop who was injured on the job. The franchisee (the local business owner who operated the Subway location) didn't have workers' compensation insurance to cover the injury. The injured worker tried to get compensation from Doctors' Associates, Inc., which is Subway's parent company that grants franchises to local operators.
The Kentucky Supreme Court ruled that Subway's corporate headquarters was not responsible for paying the worker's compensation benefits. The court determined that even though Subway sets standards and provides support to its franchisees, the actual work of running individual sandwich shops is not a "regular or recurrent part" of the corporate franchisor's business operations.
**Why This Matters for Workers:**
This decision highlights an important gap in worker protection. If you work for a franchise business (like many fast-food restaurants, retail stores, or service companies), your employer is typically the local franchisee, not the big corporate brand. If that local owner doesn't carry proper workers' compensation insurance, you may have limited options for getting benefits if injured on the job. Workers should verify their employer has proper insurance coverage and understand who their actual employer is legally.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.