Case Details
- Status
- Published
- Procedural Posture
- appeal
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
What This Ruling Means
**Adams v. Perryman: Employment Dispute**
This case involved an employment-related dispute between Adams (the worker) and Perryman (the employer) that was heard by a New York appeals court in December 2009.
**What Happened:**
Based on the limited information available, this was an employment law case where Adams brought claims against their employer, Perryman. The specific nature of the workplace dispute - whether it involved wrongful termination, discrimination, unpaid wages, or other employment issues - cannot be determined from the court records provided.
**What the Court Decided:**
The court outcome could not be resolved or determined from the available case information. No damages were reported in connection with this case.
**What This Means for Workers:**
Unfortunately, without knowing the specific details of this case or its resolution, it's difficult to draw meaningful lessons for workers. However, the case serves as a reminder that employment disputes can reach the appeals court level, which shows that workers do have legal avenues to pursue workplace grievances through the court system when other resolution methods fail.
Workers facing employment issues should document problems and consider consulting with employment attorneys about their rights.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Matter of Smelyansky v. New York State Off. of Gen. Servs.
N.Y. App. Div.Jun 2026
Gorgia v. Dolan
N.Y. App. Div.Jun 2026
Kay v. Banchik
N.Y. App. Div.Jun 2026
Cain v. North Country Community Coll.
N.Y. App. Div.May 2026
Cain v. North Country Community Coll.
N.Y. App. Div.May 2026
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.