Outcome
The appellate court reversed the trial court's denial of plaintiff's protective order, ruling that the defendant's expert cannot perform invasive procedures (including rigid sigmoidoscopy) on the disabled resident during the physical examination, though a non-invasive examination may proceed with defendant bearing transportation costs.
What This Ruling Means
**D'Adamo v. Saint Dominic's Home: Court Protects Disabled Resident from Invasive Medical Exam**
This case involved a dispute over a medical examination of a disabled resident at Saint Dominic's Home, a care facility. The resident's family (the D'Adamos) sued the facility for negligence and medical malpractice. During the lawsuit, the facility wanted their medical expert to perform an invasive procedure called a rigid sigmoidoscopy on the disabled resident as part of a physical examination to support their defense.
The trial court initially allowed this invasive examination, but the family appealed, requesting protection from the procedure. The appellate court sided with the family and reversed the lower court's decision. The court ruled that the facility's medical expert could not perform invasive procedures on the disabled resident during the examination. However, the court did allow a non-invasive physical examination to proceed, with the facility required to pay for transportation costs.
**Why this matters for workers:** This ruling shows that courts will protect vulnerable individuals, including those in care facilities, from unnecessary invasive medical procedures during legal proceedings. It demonstrates that even when employers or facilities are defending themselves in court, they cannot subject workers or residents to potentially harmful examinations without strong justification.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.