Case Details
- Status
- Published
- Procedural Posture
- BIA administrative decision interpreting immigration statute
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Outcome
The BIA held that a spouse or child cannot qualify as a derivative grandfathered alien under INA 245(i) when the family relationship was established after April 30, 2001, regardless of the principal alien's grandfathered status.
Excerpt
ESTRADA, 26 I&N Dec. 180 (BIA 2013) ID 3790 (PDF) A spouse or child accompanying or following to join a principal grandfathered alien cannot qualify as a derivative grandfathered alien for purposes of section 245(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1255(i) (2006), by virtue of a spouse or child relationship that arose after April 30, 2001.
What This Ruling Means
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.