Skip to main content

State of Tennessee v. Glenn Roby, Jr. And Kevyn Deshawn Allen

Unknown CourtMay 23, 2022

Case Details

Judge(s)
Judge Norma McGee Ogle
Status
Published
Procedural Posture
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The appellate court affirmed the defendant's conviction for forgery, rejecting his argument that the check was bearer paper and that writing a fictitious name was not a material alteration.

Excerpt

A Davidson County Criminal Court Jury convicted the Appellants, Glenn Roby, Jr., and Kevyn Deshawn Allen, of first degree premediated murder, and the trial court sentenced them to life in confinement. On appeal, Roby contends that the trial court erred by allowing proof of a robbery and shooting that occurred just hours prior to the events in this case, that the trial court erred by allowing the State to play portions of a witness's recorded interview for the jury as a prior inconsistent statement, that the trial court erred by denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis, and that he was denied his right to subpoena witnesses. Allen contends that the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction and that the trial court erred by denying his severance motion. In addition, both Appellants contend that the trial court erred by allowing inflammatory crime scene and autopsy photographs into evidence. Based upon the oral arguments, the record, and the parties' briefs, we find no reversible error and affirm the judgments of the trial court.

What This Ruling Means

**Important Note:** This case appears to be a criminal murder case, not an employment law dispute. Based on the court excerpt provided, this involves two defendants convicted of first-degree premeditated murder, not workplace issues. **What Happened:** Glenn Roby, Jr. and Kevyn Deshawn Allen were tried and convicted of first-degree premeditated murder by a Davidson County Criminal Court jury. Both men were sentenced to life in prison. They appealed their convictions, with Roby arguing that the trial court made errors in allowing certain evidence, including proof of a robbery and shooting that happened hours before the murder. **What the Court Decided:** The appellate court upheld their murder convictions and life sentences. The court rejected Roby's arguments about improper evidence being allowed during the trial. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This criminal case does not directly impact employment law or workers' rights. The case summary appears to contain conflicting information, as it's labeled as an employment law case but clearly involves a murder conviction. Workers should be aware that this ruling does not affect workplace protections, discrimination laws, wage disputes, or other employment-related legal matters.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.