In the Matter of L.W.
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Martin
- Status
- Published
- Procedural Posture
- remanded for new hearing following trial court error
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Outcome
Trial court erred by failing to appoint a guardian ad litem for respondent mother in a termination of parental rights case. Case remanded for appointment of guardian ad litem and new hearing, with mother's mental health issues requiring concurrent consideration with child neglect findings.
Excerpt
Termination of Parental Rights — failure to appoint guardian ad litem for parent — mental illness The trial court erred in a termination of parental rights case by failing to hold a hearing to determine respondent mother's entitlement under N.C.G.S. § 7B-1111(a)(6) to the appointment ofPage 388 a guardian ad litem at the hearing where the minor child was adjudicated neglected, and the case is remanded for appointment of a guardian ad litem for respondent and a new hearing. Although the trial court did not terminate respondent's parental rights by specifically relying on dependency, the mother's mental health issues were present throughout the permanency planning reviews and were so intertwined with the child's neglect as to obviate consideration of the termination order without concurrent consideration of the mental issues that were present.
What This Ruling Means
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
second opinion evaluation, temporary partial disability, wage records
unemployment benefits; discharge; voluntary departure; misconduct; benefit eligibility.
NCWHA, UDTP, severance payment, non-compete payment
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.