Skip to main contentMixed ResultMixed ResultUnresolvableDefendant WinDefendant Win
City Of Monroe Employees Retirement System v. Bridgestone Corporation
6th CircuitFebruary 4, 2005No. 03-5505Cited 194 times
Mixed ResultBridgestone Corporation
Case Details
- Status
- Published
- Procedural Posture
- appeal
- Circuit
- 6th Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Outcome
The district court's dismissal was affirmed in part and reversed in part. Claims against Kaizaki were dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction, while claims against Bridgestone, Firestone and Ono were dismissed for failure to state a claim, but the case was remanded for further proceedings.
Similar Rulings
City of Monroe Employees Retirement System v. Bridgestone Corp.
6th CircuitFeb 2005
City of Monroe Employees Retirement System v. Bridgestone Corp.
6th CircuitOct 2004
City Of Monroe Employees Retirement System v. Bridgestone Corporation
6th CircuitOct 2004
Omnicare
U.S. Supreme CourtMar 2015
Louisiana School Employees' Retirement System v. Ernst & Young, LLP
6th CircuitSep 2010
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.