Skip to main content

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Robaton

Md.November 17, 2009No. Misc. Docket AG No. 20Cited 1 time
SettlementRobaton

Case Details

Status
Published
Procedural Posture
consent decree

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Attorney David M. Robaton was disbarred by consent following a joint petition for disbarment filed in accordance with Maryland Rule 16-772.

What This Ruling Means

# Attorney David M. Robaton Disbarred in Maryland ## What Happened Attorney David M. Robaton faced disciplinary action through Maryland's Attorney Grievance Commission. The case involved employment law matters, though the specific complaints were not detailed in this summary. ## What the Court Decided Rather than proceed to a full hearing, Robaton and the Grievance Commission reached a settlement. Robaton agreed to be disbarred—meaning he lost his law license permanently—through a joint petition submitted in November 2009. This was a consensual disbarment, meaning both sides agreed this was the appropriate outcome. ## Why This Matters for Workers This case demonstrates that attorneys who mishandle employment law cases can face serious consequences, including losing their license to practice law. If you work with an employment lawyer and have concerns about their conduct, you can file a complaint with your state's bar association or attorney grievance commission. These disciplinary processes exist to protect workers and the public from unethical legal representation.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.