Attorney Grievance Commission v. McGlade
Case Details
- Status
- Published
- Procedural Posture
- Attorney Grievance Commission disciplinary action against McGlade
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Outcome
Case dismissed; this is an attorney disciplinary proceeding by the Attorney Grievance Commission against attorney McGlade, not an employment dispute.
What This Ruling Means
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Contracts—Attorney and Client—Attorney Fees. The Supreme Court granted certiorari review to determine the preclusive effect of an attorney disciplinary hearing on a subsequent civil suit. Because of admissions made by the party, the Court did not reach this question and vacated that portion of the Court of Appeals' opinion. The Court held that when an attorney enters into a contract without complying with Colo. RPC 1.8(a), the contract is presumptively void as against public policy however, a lawyer may rebut that presumption. The Court additionally held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding attorney fees at the trial level because the record supports the court's finding that the case was groundless, frivolous, and brought in bad faith. However, the Court held that the issues raised on appeal were legitimately appealable issues and, as such, do not warrant an award of fees against petitioner. The Court affirmed the Court of Appeals' judgment as to the merits on other grounds, affirmed the award of attorney fees at the trial level, and reversed the Court of Appeals' order remanding for a determination of appellate attorney fees.
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.