Attorney Grievance Commission v. Shockett
Md.September 6, 2016No. Misc. Docket AG No. 19
Defendant WinShockett
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Adkins, Barbera, Getty, Greene, Hotten, McDonald, Watts
- Status
- Published
- Procedural Posture
- appeal
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Outcome
The Court of Appeals of Maryland disbarred attorney Steven Lee Shockett effective immediately, striking his name from the register of attorneys and ordering him to pay all costs of the disciplinary proceeding.
What This Ruling Means
**What Happened**
This case involved attorney Steven Lee Shockett facing disciplinary action from Maryland's Attorney Grievance Commission. The commission brought charges against Shockett for professional misconduct, though the specific employment-related violations aren't detailed in the available information.
**What the Court Decided**
Maryland's Court of Appeals ruled against Shockett and imposed the harshest possible penalty. The court immediately disbarred him, meaning he permanently lost his license to practice law in Maryland. His name was removed from the official list of licensed attorneys, and he was ordered to pay all costs related to the disciplinary proceedings.
**Why This Matters for Workers**
When employment attorneys face serious disciplinary action or disbarment, it demonstrates that the legal profession takes misconduct seriously, even from lawyers who represent workers. This case shows that attorneys must follow strict professional standards regardless of which side they represent in employment disputes. For workers, this reinforces that there are consequences when legal professionals violate ethical rules, which helps maintain integrity in the legal system that workers rely on for protection of their employment rights.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.