No specific laws identified for this ruling.
The Michigan Supreme Court affirmed in part and reversed in part the Court of Appeals decision, holding that due-process claims for monetary relief accrue when property is actually seized or garnished, not when redetermination notices are issued. Plaintiffs Bauserman and Broe timely filed within six months of their property seizure, but plaintiff Williams did not, making his claim subject to governmental immunity.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.