Adams v. Rotkvich

**Adams v. Rotkvich: Police Officer's Lawsuit Dismissed Due to Timing** Police Officer Adams sued the Des Plaines Police Department claiming he was falsely arrested and wrongfully prosecuted by his own department. Adams argued that his employer violated his constitutional rights through these actions against him as an employee. The court dismissed Adams's case, but not because his claims lacked merit. In fact, the court found that Adams had presented a valid argument that his arrest violated the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. However, the court ruled that Adams waited too long to file his lawsuit. Federal law requires these types of constitutional violation claims to be filed within two years, and Adams missed this deadline. This case highlights an important timing rule for workers, including public employees like police officers. Even if you have a strong case against your employer for constitutional violations, you must act quickly. Workers who believe their constitutional rights have been violated at work should consult with an attorney promptly to avoid missing critical filing deadlines. Waiting too long can result in losing the right to seek justice, regardless of how valid your claims might be.