No specific laws identified for this ruling.
The court granted the defendant's motion to vacate deposition subpoenas, finding that expert witnesses retained by defendants were protected from discovery under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(4)(B) as work product prepared in anticipation of litigation, and that a dual purpose (litigation preparation and product improvement) does not negate this protection.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.