Loew v. Regret Inc. d/b/a Sunburst Pools

I cannot provide a summary of this case as an employment law ruling because the information provided indicates this is actually a family law case, not an employment law case. According to the excerpt, this case (Loew v. Regret Inc. d/b/a Sunburst Pools) dealt with parental relocation and custody modification. The court made decisions about allowing a mother to relocate a child to South Dakota and denied a father's request to change parenting time arrangements. Despite the case name suggesting it might involve an employer called "Regret Inc. d/b/a Sunburst Pools," the actual legal dispute had nothing to do with workplace issues, employee rights, wages, discrimination, or other employment matters. There appears to be an error in how this case was categorized or described. Family law cases involving child custody and relocation do not impact workers' rights or employment protections. For an accurate summary of how this case might affect workers, I would need information about an actual employment law dispute - such as issues involving wages, working conditions, discrimination, wrongful termination, or other workplace-related legal matters.