Skip to main content

Skip to main content

Workers’ Rights

Know. Document. Act.

Your Rights EEOC Guide Find an Attorney About

Sign In Check My Rights

Check My Rights

Workers' Rights is an educational tool that provides legal information, not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is created by using this platform. If you need legal advice, consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction.

Home/Employers/Cherryhill Management, Inc

Cherryhill Management, Inc

1 employment law court ruling from public federal records (2018–2018)

About this employer

Cherryhill Management, Inc appears in one federal employment-law court ruling on record. The case sits within the broader workplace context. Employment-law cases tracked on Workers' Rights come from CourtListener's federal-court opinion corpus and reflect rulings that produced a written decision — many disputes settle or are dismissed before reaching this stage.

The case involves a failure to accommodate claim. Browse other failure to accommodate rulings for comparable fact patterns and how courts have ruled. Failure to Accommodate.

Applicable statutes referenced across these rulings include: FMLA (29 U.S.C. §§ 2601-2654) — The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) entitles eligible employees of covered employers to take up to 12 weeks of unpaid, job-protected leave per year for specified family and medical reasons, with continuation of group health insurance coverage. See the FMLA reference page for filing deadlines, employee thresholds, and remedies. FMLA.

1

Total Rulings

0

States

Claim Types

Failure to Accommodate

1 (100%)

Related Laws

Court Rulings (1)

Clark v. Cherryhill Management, Inc.

Ohio Ct. App.Aug 24, 2018

The Ohio Unemployment Compensation Review Commission (Commission) decided that Plaintiff-appellant's employment termination was for just cause, and, accordingly, that she was ineligible to receive unemployment compensation benefits. The trial court affirmed the Commission's decision. The record is not sufficient to allow a determination of whether the Commission's just cause conclusion is unlawful, unreasonable, or against the manifest weight of the evidence. In particular, the record needs to be further developed to allow the Commission to determine whether Plaintiff-appellant's termination violated the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). Trial court judgment and Commission determination are reversed matter is remanded to the Commission for further proceedings.

Showing 1–1 of 1 rulings

Other employers with court rulings

Browse rulings involving similar workplaces.

Union Pacific Railroad Company

28 rulings · Transportation

Abbott Laboratories

12 rulings · Healthcare

United States Postal Service

10 rulings · Government

Department of Veterans Affairs

7 rulings · Government

Laboratory Corporation of America

6 rulings · Healthcare

City of New York

5 rulings · Government

Understand your employment rights

Free, private, no sign-up required.

Check My Rights

Is this profile inaccurate? Request a correction →

Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.