Skip to main content
Government

City of Cincinnati

3 employment law court rulings from public federal records (20072025)

3
Total Rulings
0
States

Claim Types

Wrongful Termination
2 (67%)
Unfair Labor Practice
1 (33%)

Court Rulings (3)

Janice L. Ruiz v. Butts Foods, L.P.
Unknown CourtApr 14, 2025

The plaintiff filed this lawsuit against her joint employers, asserting sexual harassment/ hostile work environment, retaliation, and other related claims. The employers filed a motion to compel arbitration. The plaintiff opposed the motion and invoked the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act of 2021, 9 U.S.C. §§ 401- -402. The trial court deemed the Act applicable and denied the motion to compel arbitration. The employers appeal. We affirm.

Defendant Win
Plush
Ohio Ct. App.Dec 16, 2020

MUNICIPAL – IMMUNITY – R.C. CHAPTER 2744 – R.C. 128.32: In a wrongful-death case alleging that the city's operation of a faulty and inadequate 911 system caused the death of plaintiffs' son, the trial court erred in denying the motion to dismiss as to the city and its employees in their official capacities: the city and its employees were immune from liability under R.C. Chapter 2744 because they were engaged in a governmental function and no exceptions in R.C. 2744.02(B) applied to remove immunity. The R.C. 2744.02(B)(5) exception does not apply where the allegations in the complaint relate to the operation and maintenance of a 911 system: R.C. 128.32(A)(1) expressly imposes liability upon a political subdivision only for misconduct relating to the creation of a 911 system. The R.C. 2744.02(B)(4) exception does not apply where the complaint failed to establish that the death occurred in or on the grounds of buildings used in connection with a governmental function. The trial court properly denied the motion to dismiss as to the employees in their individual capacities: the employees were not entitled to immunity under R.C. 2744.03(A)(6) because the complaint sufficiently alleged that the employees acted in a reckless or wanton manner. [But see DISSENT: The complaint did not sufficiently allege knowledge by the officers that their conduct would in all probability result in injury as required to establish reckless or wanton conduct under R.C. 2744.03(A)(6).]

Remanded
State Employment Relations Board v. Queen City Lodge No. 69, Fraternal Order of Police
Ohio Ct. App.Oct 26, 2007
Defendant Win

Facing a workplace issue with City of Cincinnati?

Check which employment laws may protect you — free, private, and no sign-up required.

Check My Rights

Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.