1 employment law court ruling from public federal records (1893–1893)
Scranton School District appears in one federal employment-law court ruling on record. The case sits within the education sector, where Title IX intersects with Title VII and tenure-revocation cases raise heightened procedural protections. Employment-law cases tracked on Workers' Rights come from CourtListener's federal-court opinion corpus and reflect rulings that produced a written decision — many disputes settle or are dismissed before reaching this stage.
The case involves a breach of contract claim. Browse other breach of contract rulings for comparable fact patterns and how courts have ruled. Breach of Contract.
Applicable statutes referenced across these rulings include: ADA (42 U.S.C. §§ 12111-12117) — The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits discrimination against qualified individuals with disabilities in all aspects of employment. GINA (42 U.S.C. §§ 2000ff – 2000ff-11) — Title II of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) prohibits employers from using genetic information in making employment decisions, restricts employers from requesting, requiring, or purchasing genetic information, and strictly limits the disclosure of genetic information. See the ADA, GINA reference pages for filing deadlines, employee thresholds, and remedies. ADA and GINA.
The case was filed in Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Pennsylvania rulings.
Browse rulings involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.