Skip to main content

Facemyer v. Facemyer

Ohio Ct. App.January 16, 2025No. 24 MA 0064Cited 2 times
RemandedFacemyer

Case Details

Judge(s)
Dickey
Status
Published
Procedural Posture
trial verdict

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Excerpt

DOMESTIC RELATIONS – VISITATION – termination of visitation rights; abuse of discretion standard of review; the trial court reviewed the factors in R.C. 3109.051(D) and concluded it was in the minor child's best interest to terminate Appellant's visitation; however, the court did not make the required initial finding that there was clear and convincing evidence of extraordinary circumstances that would justify such termination; R.C. 3109.051(C); recorded statement should not have been accepted or considered; in camera interview; reversed and remanded.

What This Ruling Means

# Facemyer v. Facemyer: Court Decision Summary ## What Happened This case involved a dispute about a parent's visitation rights with their child. The employer or company Facemyer sought to terminate the other party's ability to visit their child, claiming it was in the child's best interest. ## What the Court Decided The Ohio appeals court sent the case back to the lower court to be retried. The court found that the lower court made a mistake: it ended the visitation rights without first providing clear and convincing proof of serious, unusual circumstances that would justify such a dramatic action. Additionally, the court improperly accepted a recorded statement as evidence that shouldn't have been admitted. ## Why This Matters for Workers This ruling reinforces that courts must follow proper procedures and meet strict standards before making major decisions affecting families. Even when someone believes they're acting in a child's best interest, they must present solid evidence and follow legal requirements. The decision protects workers and parents by ensuring courts don't make irreversible family decisions without meeting high standards of proof and following correct procedures.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.