Skip to main content

STATE v. ARMSTRONG

OKLACRIMAPPJanuary 30, 2025No. SR-2023-836Cited 1 time
Defendant WinARMSTRONG

Case Details

Status
Published
Procedural Posture
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals upheld the admissibility of evidence that the defendant refused a breath test and reversed the trial court's restrictions on how the State could present this evidence to the jury.

Excerpt

¶1 The State charged Appellee Ramon Ambrose Armstrong, in the District Court of Comanche County, Case No. CF-2020-447, with Driving a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol Second and Subsequent (Count 1), in violation of 47 O.S.Supp.2018, § 11-902 (A)(1), Prisoner Placing Bodily Fluids on Government Employee (Count 2), in violation of 21 O.S.2011, § 650.9 , and Unsafe Lane Use (Count 3), in violation of 47 O.S.Supp.2018, § 11-309 . The Honorable Grant Sheperd, District Judge, presided over Armstrong's jury trial. The jury acquitted Armstrong on each count.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.