Skip to main contentUnknownUnknownUnknownPlaintiff WinMixed Result
Estrada v. City of Los Angeles
Cal. Ct. App.July 24, 2013No. B242202Cited 19 times
Defendant WinCity of Los Angeles
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Klein
- Status
- Published
- Procedural Posture
- appeal
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Discrimination
Outcome
The trial court properly determined that Estrada, a volunteer Police Reserve Officer, was not an employee under California's Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) and therefore could not maintain a disability discrimination claim. The appellate court affirmed this judgment.
Similar Rulings
Noho Diagnostic Center, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles
C.D. Cal.Aug 2025
Alex Duarte v. City of Los Angeles
C.D. Cal.Oct 2024
Alex Duarte v. City of Los Angeles
C.D. Cal.Sep 2024
Shelley Savage v. Glendale Union High School, District No. 205, Maricopa County
9th CircuitSep 2003
Sheet Metal Workers
U.S. Supreme CourtJul 1986
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.