State ex rel. Rose v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.
Case Details
- Status
- Published
- Procedural Posture
- appeal
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The Ohio Supreme Court denied the employee's mandamus petition, holding that the State Personnel Board of Review lacked jurisdiction to hear appeals from probationary employee removals for unsatisfactory performance, and affirmed that the employer's removal decision was lawful.
Excerpt
Public employment—Removal of employee during probationary period—Mandamus sought to compel Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction to comply with the State Personnel Board of Review's order reinstating relator to her position at the London Correctional Institution with back pay and benefits—Writ denied, when.
Similar Rulings
Civ.R. 56 motion for summary judgment employment discrimination retaliation adverse employment action Family and Medical Leave Act. Defendant was entitled to summary judgment on plaintiff's claim for employment discrimination based on age and disability because plaintiff failed to establish that she suffered an adverse employment action. Defendant was entitled to summary judgment on plaintiff's claim of retaliation as plaintiff failed to state a prima facie claim for retaliation since she could not show a causal connection between any alleged adverse employment action and her FMLA leave. Judgment for defendant.
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.