No specific laws identified for this ruling.
The Ohio Supreme Court vacated the arbitration award, holding that the arbitrator exceeded his authority under R.C. 2711.10(D) by relying on extraneous city rules rather than the plain language of the CBA to deny paid injury leave for carpal tunnel syndrome.
Employer and employee—Arbitration—Arbitrator exceeded his authority by relying on rules extraneous to the collective bargaining agreement to determine the eligibility of union employees to receive paid injury leave for carpal tunnel syndrome, when—Arbitration award vacated, when—R.C. 2711.10(D), applied.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Trial court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of appellees on appellant's claim for race discrimination.
Mandamus—Labor relations—Public employees—R.C. Ch. 4117—State Employment Relations Board abused its discretion in dismissing public employee's unfair-labor-practice charge against employer because employer did not have authority to determine that employee's notice to arbitrate was untimely under collective-bargaining agreement—Board abused its discretion when it dismissed public employee's unfair-labor-practice charge against union without providing basic rationale for dismissal—Board did not abuse its discretion when it dismissed public employee's additional unfair-labor-practice charge against union, because union acted in accordance with public employee's waiver of union representation—Court of appeals' judgment granting writ of mandamus affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Workers' compensation—Temporary-total-disability compensation—R.C. 4123.56—Employee who had already been terminated for violation of employment policies before his shoulder surgery was not "unable to work" as "direct result of an impairment arising from an injury or occupational disease" under plain language of R.C. 4123.56(F) and thus was not entitled to receive temporary-total-disability compensation—Court of appeals' judgment reversed and writ granted.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.