No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Court ruled that plaintiff was not the valid spouse of the decedent under ERISA because the decedent was still married to his second wife when he married plaintiff, rendering plaintiff's marriage void ab initio. Plaintiff therefore had no entitlement to the 401(k) plan funds.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.