No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Appellate court affirmed the district court's grant of harassment restraining orders (HROs) protecting the respondent and minor children, rejecting appellants' arguments that the children should not be included as protected persons.
In these consolidated appeals from the district court's grant of harassment restraining orders (HROs), appellants argue that the record does not support the inclusion of respondent's minor children as persons protected by those HROs. We affirm.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.