Karla Lynn Mitchell v. Warren Mark Linn Black
Case Details
- Status
- Unpublished
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal from district court grant of harassment restraining order; court of appeals affirmed
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The court affirmed the district court's grant of a harassment restraining order against Warren Black, finding he violated existing HROs by following, monitoring, and pursuing the respondent Karla Mitchell.
Excerpt
Appellant Warren Black demanded an evidentiary hearing to challenge a petition for a harassment restraining order (HRO) filed by respondent Karla Mitchell. The district court granted the HRO, reasoning that Black had violated active HROs by harassing Mitchell at least three times. Black asks us to reverse the district court's decision granting the HRO request. We affirm because the record supports the district court's finding that Black engaged in following, monitoring, or pursuing Mitchell in violation of existing HROs, Black's due-process rights were vindicated, and the district court acted within its discretion in fashioning the HRO.
Similar Rulings
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.