Jenna Marie Benzinger v. Roger Tabet
Case Details
- Status
- Unpublished
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal from order denying motion to reopen harassment-restraining-order proceeding
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's denial of Roger Tabet's motion to reopen a harassment-restraining-order proceeding, finding no abuse of discretion.
Excerpt
In this appeal from an order denying a motion to reopen a harassment-restraining-order (HRO) proceeding pursuant to Minnesota Rule of Civil Procedure 60.02, appellant argues that the district court abused its discretion by denying his motion. Because the district court acted within its discretion by denying his motion to reopen, we affirm.
Similar Rulings
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.