Benita M Brannon v. John Sterling Howe
Case Details
- Status
- Unpublished
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal of district court's grant of harassment restraining order; affirmed by appellate court
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The appellate court affirmed the district court's grant of a harassment restraining order against the appellant, rejecting his argument that his conduct was not objectively unreasonable or substantially adverse.
Excerpt
Appellant challenges the district court's grant of a harassment restraining order (HRO), arguing that his conduct was not objectively unreasonable and did not have a substantial adverse effect on respondent that was objectively reasonable. We affirm.
Similar Rulings
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.