In Re Termination of Parental Rights as to D.S.
Case Details
- Status
- Published
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal addressing procedural jurisdictional question regarding service of process in parental rights termination proceeding
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Outcome
Appellate case addressing whether service of a termination of parental rights motion on assigned counsel rather than the attorney of record constitutes a jurisdictional defect under Arizona Juvenile Court Rules.
Excerpt
Whether service of a motion for termination on assigned counsel for a parent, who was not the attorney of record for the parent under Arizona Rule of Procedure for the Juvenile Court 303, means the juvenile court's order granting the motion is void for lack of personal jurisdiction.
Similar Rulings
When a prosecutor almost exclusively used leading andclose-ended questions when presenting the case to the grand jury to the pointthe prosecutor testified and as a result avoided testimony about clearlyexculpatory evidence relating to the defendant's justification defense , should the superior court remand the caseto the grand jury for a redetermination of probable cause?
1. Did the superior court err in concluding that Arizona's real estate broker licensing statutes required plaintiffs' employees to be licensed under A.R.S. § 32 2101 for their activities? 2. Did the superior court err in determining that the contracts formed through plaintiffs' unlicensed brokerage activities were illegal and void, thereby precluding plaintiffs' tortious interference claims?
Judicial Assistant Manual 2025 Whether a 2006 initiative allowing certain local governments to "regulate minimum wages" impliedly repealed a 1984 legislative referral prohibiting political subdivisions from mandating that government contractors pay their employees prevailing wages.
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.