Skip to main contentDefendant WinDefendant WinDismissedDismissed
Chad Pinkerton and the Pinkerton Law Firm, PLLC v. Mark Keough
Tex. App.—9th Dist.March 26, 2026No. 09-25-00089-CV
DismissedFederal Bureau of Prisons
Case Details
- Nature of Suit
- Interlocutory
- Status
- Published
- Procedural Posture
- motion to dismiss
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Outcome
Court summarily dismissed petitioner's habeas corpus petition without prejudice because the requested relief (transfer to medical facility) is not available under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and must instead be pursued through a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
Similar Rulings
Thomas O'Neal v. American Shaman Franchise Systems, Inc.
11th CircuitFeb 2026
Ramirez
N.D. Cal.Oct 2025
Malott
E.D. Wis.Sep 2025
In Re Equity One Franchisors, LLC v. the State of Texas
Tex. App.—9th Dist.Apr 2026
In Re CHRISTUS Health Southeast Texas v. the State of Texas
Tex. App.—9th Dist.Mar 2026
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.