Skip to main content
Skip to main content

Searcy v. Vilsack

D.D.C.April 14, 2026No. Civil Action No. 2025-1012

Case Details

Judge(s)
Judge Jia M. Cobb
Status
Published
Procedural Posture
appeal
Circuit
DC Circuit

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The trial court granted summary disposition in favor of the insurance company, dismissing the plaintiff's complaint for PIP benefits. The court of appeals affirmed, finding that SDW, a nonresident, was not entitled to PIP benefits under the reformed no-fault act provisions effective June 11, 2019, which excluded nonresidents unless they owned a registered and insured vehicle in Michigan.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.