Skip to main content

Wimer v. Pennsylvania Employees Benefit Trust Fund

PADecember 27, 2007No. 38 WAP 2006Cited 28 times

Case Details

Judge(s)
Cappy, Castille, Saylor, Eakin, Baer, Baldwin
Status
Published
Procedural Posture
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court affirmed the lower courts' decisions that the healthcare benefits recipient was not required to exhaust internal administrative remedies before filing suit, and that the benefits plan's subrogation rights did not accrue until after it paid the recipient's medical benefits, at which point it had ceased being an ERISA-qualified plan and thus could not exercise subrogation rights.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.