Skip to main content

McDonald v. City of Oakland

Unknown CourtApril 20, 1965Cited 15 times

Case Details

Judge(s)
Shoemaker
Status
Published
Procedural Posture
appeal from Superior Court judgment of nonsuit

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Appellate court reversed judgment of nonsuit in wrongful death action against City of Oakland, remanding for trial on the merits regarding death of an employee of an independent contractor hired by the city.

Excerpt

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. Richard H. Chamberlain, Judge. Reversed. Action for the wrongful death of an employee of an independent contractor hired by a city. Judgment of nonsuit reversed.

Similar Rulings

Alameda County Taxpayers' Assn., Inc. v. City of Oakland
Cal. Ct. App.Mar 2026
Dismissed
Anti Police-Terror Project v. City of Oakland
N.D. Cal.Oct 2023
Dismissed
Anti Police-Terror Project v. City of Oakland
N.D. Cal.Dec 2022
Unresolvable
In re General Motors LLC Ignition Switch Litigation
S.D.N.Y.Jun 2017
Settlement
Ruehl
Unknown CourtMar 1912

<p>Appeal from the District Court of Richland county; Allen, J.</p> <p>Action under the statute to recover damages caused by death by wrongful act. Verdict directed in favor of defendant. Plaintiff appeals.</p> <p>This is an action brought under the statute by Louis Ruehl, the father of, and administrator of the estate of, Louis Ruehl, Jr., deceased, for and on behalf of the father and mother and sisters of the deceased, to recover damages for the death of the said Louis Ruehl, Jr., alleged to have been occasioned by the defendant by carelessly and negligently leaving a telephone' post hole “without placing any guards over or above the same, and without taking any precaution of any kind to avoid.” the accident. The evidence is to the effect that on or about the 1st day of April, 1910, one L. J. Christenson was president and manager of the defendant telephone company; that about such time the company arranged to extend its line past the house of the plaintiff and to put a telephone therein; that the dwelling house of the plaintiff stood about 4 rods from the east end of the section line, on which was laid out a traveled highway; that before the holes in which the telephone poles were to be set were dug, defendant telephone company had caused the necessary poles to be hauled and placed along the route of the proposed extension, at about the places where the same were to be set, and had caused the places where it was proposed to have the holes dug marked or designated by sticks or broken lath; that on or about the 1st day of April, 1910, Christenson, on behalf of the telephone company, employed one Frank Zimmerman to dig a line of post holes along the said extension, and agreed to pay him 12-J cents for each hole; that Christenson told said Zimmerman what to do, and supplied him with the tools, and told him how to do the work; that the post holes were to be 4|- feet deep, and that this depth was directed by Christenson; that the spade used by Zimmerman was given to him

Defendant Win

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.