No specific laws identified for this ruling.
The court dismissed plaintiffs' claims for negligence, breach of contract, warranty breach, negligent misrepresentation, strict products liability, and negligent infliction of emotional distress on statute of limitations grounds, finding that claims accrued when the defective sperm was delivered in 1995 and were barred by Pennsylvania's two-year tort statute of limitations and four-year contract statute of limitations by the time suit was filed in 2008.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.