Skip to main contentMixed ResultUnresolvablePlaintiff WinMixed ResultRemanded
Neilson v. Union Bank of California, N.A.
C.D. Cal.October 20, 2003No. CV02-06942MMMCWXCited 243 times
DismissedUnion Bank of California, N.A.
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Morrow
- Status
- Published
- Procedural Posture
- motion to dismiss
- State
- California
- Circuit
- 9th Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Breach of ContractWrongful Termination
Outcome
The court granted in part and denied in part multiple defendants' motions to dismiss the third amended complaint in this class action Ponzi scheme case. Comerica Bank's motion was fully granted; other defendants' motions were partially granted with some claims surviving dismissal.
Similar Rulings
Trustees of the Automobile Mechanics Local No. 701 Pension & Welfare Funds v. Union Bank of California, N.A.
N.D. Ill.Jul 2009
Eilts
9th CircuitMay 2006
Union Bank of California, N.A. v. Superior Court
Cal. Ct. App.Jun 2005
Daniel J. Ciambriello v. County of Nassau, Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Russell Rinchiuso, Richard Cotugno and Ron Roeill
2nd CircuitJun 2002
Betty K Agencies, Ltd. v. M/V Monada
11th CircuitDec 2005
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.