Skip to main contentUnresolvablePlaintiff WinMixed ResultMixed ResultPlaintiff Win
Harman v. Unisys Corp.
E.D. Va.September 17, 2010No. 1:08-cv-00542Cited 2 times
Mixed ResultUnisys Corporation
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Gerald Bruce Lee
- Nature of Suit
- 442 Civil rights jobs
- Status
- Published
- Procedural Posture
- motion to dismiss
- State
- Virginia
- Circuit
- 4th Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
RetaliationDiscrimination
Outcome
Court denied defendant's motion to dismiss Counts I (Title VII retaliation), II (ADEA retaliation), and III (§1981 retaliation), allowing plaintiff to proceed on all three retaliation claims. Court granted defendant's motion to strike plaintiff's request for attorney's fees because plaintiff was proceeding pro se.
Similar Rulings
Kelley
D. Colo.Mar 2021
In Re Unisys Corp. Retiree Medical Benefits Erisa
3rd CircuitSep 2009
In Re: Unisys Corp.
3rd CircuitMar 2001
Daniel J. Ciambriello v. County of Nassau, Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Russell Rinchiuso, Richard Cotugno and Ron Roeill
2nd CircuitJun 2002
Shelley Savage v. Glendale Union High School, District No. 205, Maricopa County
9th CircuitSep 2003
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.