No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Court denied defendant's motion to dismiss Counts I (Title VII retaliation), II (ADEA retaliation), and III (§1981 retaliation), allowing plaintiff to proceed on all three retaliation claims. Court granted defendant's motion to strike plaintiff's request for attorney's fees because plaintiff was proceeding pro se.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.