Skip to main contentUnknownUnknownUnknownDefendant WinDefendant Win
Stephens v. U.S. Department of Labor
D.D.C.September 11, 2008No. Civil Action 07-00858 (HHK)Cited 5 times
Defendant WinUnited States Department of Labor
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Kennedy
- Status
- Published
- Procedural Posture
- summary judgment
- State
- District of Columbia
- Circuit
- DC Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Wage Theft
Outcome
The Department of Labor's decision to deny plaintiff benefits under Part E of EEOICPA was upheld as not arbitrary and capricious. The court granted DOL's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion, finding that Loral American did not qualify as a 'DOE facility' under the statutory definition.
Similar Rulings
Gregory Hanna v. United States Department of Labor
4th CircuitOct 2025
Familias Unidas Por La Justicia AFL-CIO v. United States Department of Labor
W.D. Wash.Sep 2025
Macks USA, Inc v. United States Department of Labor
S.D.N.Y.Dec 2024
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Port Authority of New York & New Jersey
2nd CircuitSep 2014
Adkins
4th CircuitAug 2002
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.