No specific laws identified for this ruling.
The Second Circuit affirmed summary judgment for defendants, holding that an annuity owned by Adam Rose and naming Hardy as beneficiary did not constitute an 'employee benefit plan' under ERISA because it lacked the administrative complexity required by ERISA standards.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.