Rupert v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Klatt
- Status
- Published
- Procedural Posture
- appeal
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment, which upheld the State Personnel Board's modification of the plaintiff's removal to a demotion. The court rejected all three assignments of error and found the demotion was supported by reliable, probative, and substantial evidence.
Excerpt
The trial court did not err in affirming the order of the State Personnel Board of Review that modified the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction's decision to remove appellant from his employment.
Similar Rulings
Civ.R. 56 motion for summary judgment employment discrimination retaliation adverse employment action Family and Medical Leave Act. Defendant was entitled to summary judgment on plaintiff's claim for employment discrimination based on age and disability because plaintiff failed to establish that she suffered an adverse employment action. Defendant was entitled to summary judgment on plaintiff's claim of retaliation as plaintiff failed to state a prima facie claim for retaliation since she could not show a causal connection between any alleged adverse employment action and her FMLA leave. Judgment for defendant.
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.