Skip to main content

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF FELIX BRAUNIN THE MATTER OF THE PROBATE OF THE LOST WILL OF SYLVIA BRAUN(O-9701 AND P-3275, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)(CONSOLIDATED)

NJSUPERCTAPPDIVNovember 2, 2017No. A-3816-14T2/A-2861-15T2

Case Details

Status
Unpublished
Procedural Posture
Consolidated probate matter in Union County, Court of Appeals Division

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

This is a probate matter consolidating two estates (Felix Braun and Sylvia Braun) involving a lost will. No employment dispute or damages information is present.

Similar Rulings

Hines
Unknown CourtJun 1912

<p>Appeal from Caldwell Circuit Court. — Hon. F. H. Trimble, Judge.</p> <p>(1) Until a will is probated it is not effective to pass title. Shaffer v. Howerton, 123 Mo. 637; Dublin v. Chadbourn, 16 Mass. 433; Bacon v. Railroad, 145 HI. App. 502. (2) Probate in common form is as final ,...and conclusive after the lapse of the statutory period for contest as probate in solemn form. Crippen v. Dexter, 79 Mass. 330; Wells v. Wells, 4 T. B. Monroe, 152; Duncan v. Duncan, 23 111. 324; Parker v. Parker, 65 Mass. (11 Cush.) 519. (3) Contest must be in courts where probated. Crippen v. Dexter, 79 Mass. 330; Tilt v. Kelsey, 207 U. S. 43; Coming’s Will, 159 Mich. 474; Rachnan v. Taylor, 204 Mass. 394; Bryan v. Nash, 110 Ya. 329. (4) Admission of will, to probate is a special proceeding and not governed^by the usual rules of pleading and practice. Wells v. Wells, 4 T. B. Monroe, 152; Clearchrings Twp. v. Blough, 88 N. E. 611. (5) Where the probate act is silent, resort may be had to the general code as to parties and practice in contest cases. Lilly v. Tobein, 103 Mo. 477; State es reí. v. Guiño tte, 157 Mo. 513. (6) Answers in a contest case, averring that defendants had no sufficient information to affirm or deny the allegations of the petition, are equivalent to a general denial. Pomeroy on Remedies, sec. 640; Bliss on Code Plead., sec. 326; Walsor v. Hawkins, 60 Mo. 560; Humphrey v. McCall, 70 Am. Dec. 626. (7) More was required in the Sloan contest to give the circuit court jurisdiction than merely filing a petition and getting service on defendants. Heady v. Crouse, 203 Mo. 100. (8) .The relief granted ought not to be broader than issues tendered by the pleadings. Powell v. Crow, 204 Mo. 481. Howard v. Brown, 197 Mo. 53. (9) The defendants to the contest suit were adversaries of Mrs. Sloan, but not of each other. Badeau v. Logan, 2 Paige, 209; Glasner v. Weusberg, 43 Mo. App. 244; Roselle v. Bank, 119 Mo. 84. (10) A decree is only conclusive on adversary parties. McMahon v

Defendant Win
Sucesión De Antonio Villanueva Bonilla T/C/C Antonio Villanueva Compuesta Por: Idalis Villanueva Alarcón Mayra Enid Villanueva Alarcón Y Roberto Villanueva Alarcón Representados Por Su Apoderada, Jozymar Alarcón Velázquez v. Antonio Villanueva Rivera
PRAPPJan 2026
Unresolvable
Joseph J. Emmons, III, Etc. v. Elmwood Hills Healthcare Center, LLC
NJSUPERCTAPPDIVMar 2026
Defendant Win
State of New Jersey v. Jada M. McClain
NJSUPERCTAPPDIVMar 2026
Unresolvable
Mario Quesada v. Compassion First Pet Hospitals
NJSUPERCTAPPDIVMar 2026
Unresolvable

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.