No specific laws identified for this ruling.
The North Carolina Supreme Court affirmed in part the Court of Appeals' reversal of the trial court's dismissal, holding that police officer Tully adequately stated a claim under Article I, Section 1 of the North Carolina Constitution that the City violated his right to enjoy the fruits of his own labor by arbitrarily refusing to follow its own promotional appeal policy.
Action by City employee alleging that the City acted arbitrarily in failing to follow its established personnel policies when denying him a promotion appeal from trial court's grant of judgment on the pleadings in favor of the City whether plaintiff sufficiently alleged claims under Article I, Sections 1 and 19 of the state constitution.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Whether a unilateral amendment made pursuant to a change-of-terms provision violates the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing and renders a contract illusory.
Whether the Industrial Commission's calculation of the plaintiff's average weekly wages pursuant to N.C.G.S. 97-2(5) and its determination concerning whether that calculation produces results that are fair and just to both parties involve an issue of law or an issue of fact.
Whether State employees are entitled to sovereign immunity against claims of negligence, gross negligence, and wrongful death brought against them in their individual capacities, and whether complaint stated cause of action.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.