No specific laws identified for this ruling.
App.R. 3(D) notice of appeal affidavit strike evidence summary judgment trade secret misappropriation breach of contract tortious interference business relationship improper invoice written admission counterclaim deposition testimony admissible untimely Civ.R. 56. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in striking the untimely affidavit attached to the appellants' brief in opposition to summary judgment. Nor did the court abuse its discretion in striking exhibits that were not incorporated in a properly framed affidavit. The trial court erred as a matter of law in granting summary judgment in favor of defendants. Defendants did not come forward with admissible evidence suggesting that there is a genuine issue for trial.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.