Harrah v. Mike Enyart & Sons, Inc.

Ohio Ct. App.January 7, 2019No. 18CA8Cited 1 time

Mixed ResultMike Enyart and Sons, Inc.

Case Details

Judge(s): Abele
Status: Published
Procedural Posture: appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The trial court ruled in favor of the plaintiff on the profit-sharing calculation dispute, but the appellate court remanded for recalculation of damages regarding net profits methodology, health insurance deductions, and asset ownership.

Excerpt

Contracts–trial court's determination to use company's tax returns for purposes of calculating "net profits" not against the manifest weight of the evidence when company vice president offered conflicting accounts of how she determined net profits trial court entitled to find vice president's testimony not worthy of belief trial court's finding that employer agreed to provide employee health insurance coverage not against the manifest weight of the evidence when three out of four people present at meeting during which employment offered testified that employer would provide health insurance appellant's argument that trial court failed to charge cost of motorcycle trailer against appellee's share of net profits unsupported–instead, trial court did charge cost of motorcycle trailer to appellee trial court's finding that golf cart in appellee's possession constituted gift not against manifest weight of the evidence

What This Ruling Means

# Court Summary: Harrah v. Mike Enyart & Sons, Inc. ## What Happened An employee claimed that Mike Enyart & Sons, Inc. breached a contract promising profit-sharing payments and health insurance coverage. The worker and employer disagreed about how to calculate the company's profits and whether certain costs should be deducted. ## What the Court Decided The trial court sided with the employee on the profit-sharing dispute. However, the appeals court found issues with how damages were calculated. The court sent the case back for recalculation, questioning which method should determine net profits, how health insurance costs factor in, and who owns certain company assets. ## Why This Matters for Workers This case shows that courts will enforce profit-sharing agreements and benefits promised in employment contracts. However, the details matter significantly—how a company calculates profits directly affects what workers receive. If you have a profit-sharing deal, get specifics in writing about calculation methods. Document all discussions about promised benefits, and keep records of company financial information used to calculate your share.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Breach of Contract cases

9th CircuitNov 2000

Mixed Result

Umland v. PLANCO Financial Services, Inc.

3rd CircuitSep 2008

Defendant Win

State v. Myers

Ohio Ct. App.Apr 2026

Remanded

Lashaway v. Lashaway

Ohio Ct. App.Mar 2026

Dismissed

State v. Ayers

Ohio Ct. App.Mar 2026

Plaintiff Win

Read Full Opinion More Mike Enyart and Sons, Inc. Rulings All Rulings

Browse Related

Other other employers

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

Check Your Rights Learn the Basics

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.