OKADA VS. DIST. CT. (WYNN RESORTS, LTD.)
Case Details
- Status
- Published
- Procedural Posture
- appeal
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The Nevada Supreme Court granted the petition for a writ of mandamus, determining that the gaming privilege in NRS 463.120(6) applies only prospectively to discovery requests made on or after June 12, 2017, and therefore did not apply to requests made in August 2014 and February 2016. The court reversed the district court's denial of the motion to compel discovery.
What This Ruling Means
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.