The court reversed the trial court's award of attorney fees to the Union, holding that RCW 49.48.030 does not apply to attorney fees incurred in unfair labor practice proceedings before the Public Employment Relations Commission, distinguishing such administrative proceedings from arbitration.
What This Ruling Means
# Kitsap County Police Union Case Summary
## What Happened
A police union in Washington state sued Kitsap County, claiming the county breached a labor contract. The union won at trial and asked the court to make the county pay the union's attorney fees for the case.
## What the Court Decided
The appeals court sided with the county and reversed the decision. The court ruled that Washington state law does not require employers to pay a union's legal costs in labor disputes handled through administrative hearings. The judge distinguished this situation from arbitration cases, where different rules about attorney fees apply.
## Why This Matters for Workers
This ruling narrows when unions can recover attorney fees from employers during labor disputes. Workers represented by unions should understand that winning a case at an administrative labor board may not result in the employer paying legal costs—unlike in some other legal proceedings. This means unions must budget carefully for dispute resolution, potentially affecting what resources are available to pursue worker complaints.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.