Skip to main contentDefendant WinUnknownUnknownMixed ResultDefendant Win
Verbitski v. Union Pacific Railroad
Ark. Ct. App.January 5, 2011No. No. CA 10-582Cited 2 times
Defendant WinUnion Pacific Railroad Company
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Agree, Brown, Pittman, Robbins
- Status
- Published
- Procedural Posture
- appeal
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Wrongful Termination
Outcome
The trial court's dismissal of plaintiff's complaint for failure to effect service within 120 days was affirmed. Although the court acknowledged an oral extension may have been granted, the appeal court ruled that Rule 4(i) requires a written order to be effective, and no such order was entered.
Similar Rulings
Huntsman
N.D. Cal.Dec 2025
Griffin
D. Neb.Nov 2025
Vasquez
5th CircuitOct 2025
Daniel J. Ciambriello v. County of Nassau, Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Russell Rinchiuso, Richard Cotugno and Ron Roeill
2nd CircuitJun 2002
Giovanni Molina-Estrada v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
9th CircuitJun 2002
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.