Skip to main content

In re Reinstatement of Wagener

OKLAFebruary 14, 2012No. No. SCBD-5749

Case Details

Judge(s)
Colbert, Combs, Edmondson, Gurich, Kauger, Reif, Taylor, Watt, Winchester
Status
Published
Procedural Posture
Reinstatement proceeding

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Reinstatement proceeding regarding Wagener; insufficient case details provided to determine outcome.

Similar Rulings

Babcock
D. Mass.Jan 2023
Unresolvable
DON KEENAN v. TODD RUSS, in his capacity as the Treasurer of the State of Oklahoma
OKLAApr 2026
CHICK-FIL-A
OKLAMar 2026

¶0 Petitioner seeks writs of prohibition and mandamus to preclude enforcement and require modification of Respondent's discovery order. We assume original jurisdiction and grant the writ of prohibition.

Plaintiff Win
GREER
OKLADec 2025

¶0 Melissa Evans died in a car accident on September 3, 2020, leaving a will that named her former spouse as the primary beneficiary and her descendants as contingent beneficiaries. Her son, Joshua Evans, initiated probate proceedings and, on November 17, 2020, obtained an order which admitted the will to probate, appointed Joshua as personal representative, and identified the heirs, devisees, and legatees. Joshua was later removed, and James Greer was appointed as successor personal representative. On January 5, 2024, Greer moved to vacate that portion of the 2020 order identifying heirs and beneficiaries. The motion alleged Joshua neglected to serve two individuals entitled to notice, including the decedent's former stepdaughter. The trial court granted the motion on March 25, 2024. Two months later the trial judge entered a new order modifying the list of heirs and beneficiaries, specifically finding Decedent's former stepdaughter was a beneficiary under the will. Joshua filed the present appeal on June 11, 2024, challenging both the court's authority to vacate the 2020 order and its subsequent determination of heir and beneficiary status. We retained the appeal but now dismiss it, concluding that Joshua's challenge to the vacatur order is untimely and that the interlocutory order identifying heirs, devisees, and legatees is not appealable.

Dismissed
BROOKE
OKLANov 2025

¶0 This appeal concerns the Oklahoma Open Records Act and the public's access to metadata.

Unresolvable

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.