Court affirmed judgment annulling the Governor's Office of Employee Relations' determinations that denied back pay for out-of-title work, finding the agency's decision to retroactively apply a nonexistent salary grade classification was arbitrary and capricious.
What This Ruling Means
# Kopyt v. Governor's Office of Employee Relations
**What Happened**
A state employee named Kopyt performed work that was supposed to be classified at a higher salary level than the position she held. When she requested back pay for this out-of-title work, the Governor's Office of Employee Relations denied her claim. The agency justified its decision by applying a salary classification that didn't actually exist at the time she did the work.
**The Court's Decision**
New York's appeals court sided with Kopyt. The judges ruled that the agency's decision was arbitrary and unfair because it retroactively created a salary category that wasn't real when the work occurred. The court threw out the agency's denial and restored Kopyt's right to receive back pay.
**Why This Matters for Workers**
This ruling protects employees who perform higher-level work. Employers cannot deny back pay by inventing new rules after the fact. If you work beyond your official job title, you have the right to fair compensation for that extra work, and agencies cannot use nonexistent policies to avoid paying you.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.